WASHINGTON (NYTIMES) – US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday (Nov 29) ordered a new high-level investigation into a US airstrike in Syria in 2019 that killed dozens of women and children, according to a senior Defence Department official.
The investigation by General Michael Garrett, the four-star head of the Army’s Forces Command, will examine the strike, which was carried out by a shadowy, classified Special Operations unit called Task Force 9, as well as the handling of the task force’s investigation by higher military headquarters and the Defence Department’s inspector-general, the official said.
Gen Garrett will have 90 days to review inquiries already conducted into the episode, and further investigate reports of civilian casualties, whether any violations of laws of war occurred, record-keeping errors, whether any recommendations from earlier reviews were carried out, and whether anyone should be held accountable, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation had not been announced.
The Pentagon is expected to announce the new inquiry Monday after notifying Congress. Both the House and Senate Armed Services committees have said they are investigating the episode.
Mr Austin’s decision comes in the wake of a New York Times investigation this month that described allegations that top officers and civilian officials had sought to conceal the casualties.
In a news conference two weeks ago, Mr Austin vowed to overhaul military procedures and hold top officers responsible for civilian harm, but he did not outline any systemic problems that had allowed civilian casualties to persist on battlefields in Syria and Afghanistan.
The Syria airstrike, which took place near the town of Baghuz on March 18, 2019, as part of the final battle against Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) fighters in a shard of a once-sprawling religious state across Iraq and Syria. It was among the largest episodes of civilian casualties in the years-long war against the ISIS group, but the US military had never publicly acknowledged it.
The classified task force investigated the strike and acknowledged that four civilians were killed, but it also concluded that there had been no wrongdoing by the Special Operations unit. In October 2019, the task force sent its findings to the Central Command headquarters in Tampa, Florida.
But officials at Central Command did not follow up and failed to remind a subordinate military headquarters in Baghdad to do so, in what Captain Bill Urban, a Central Command spokesperson, described as “an administrative oversight.”
As a result, senior military officials in Iraq and Florida never reviewed the strike, and the investigation technically remained open until the Times investigation.
Mr Austin, who became defence secretary this year, received a classified briefing this month about the strike and the military’s handling of it from General Kenneth McKenzie Jr, head of the military’s Central Command, which oversaw the air war in Syria.
The Times investigation showed that the death toll from the strike – 80 people – was almost immediately apparent to military officials. A legal officer flagged the bombing as a possible war crime that required an investigation.
But at nearly every step, the military made moves that concealed the catastrophic strike. The Defence Department’s independent inspector-general began an inquiry, but the report containing its findings was stalled and stripped of any mention of the strike.
In an email to the Senate Armed Services Committee last spring, the legal officer who witnessed the strike warned that “senior ranking US military officials intentionally and systematically circumvented the deliberate strike process,” and that there was a good chance that “the highest levels of government remained unaware of what was happening on the ground.”
A spokesperson for the Armed Services Committee, Mr Chip Unruh, said the panel “remains actively engaged and continues to look at the matter.”
Representative Adam Smith, who heads the House Armed Services Committee, announced this month that his panel would also investigate the strike and the military’s handling of it.
The Times investigation found that the bombing by Air Force F-15E attack jets had been called in by Task Force 9, made up largely of the US Army’s elite Delta Force. The task force was in charge of ground operations in Syria, working closely with Syrian Kurdish and Arab militia.
Military personnel who spoke to the Times said the secretive task force circumvented oversight by claiming that a vast majority of its strikes required immediate action to protect allied troops from imminent threat. Often, military officers said, no such threat was present.
After the Times sent its findings to Central Command, the command acknowledged the attack for the first time. It said in a statement that the 80 deaths were justified because the task force had launched a self-defence strike against a group of fighters who were an imminent threat to allied forces on the ground.
Central Command told the Times that the strike had included three guided bombs: a 500-pound bomb that hit the initial group and two 2,000-pound bombs that targeted people fleeing the initial blast. The command later corrected itself, saying all three bombs were 500-pound munitions.
The command said the three strikes killed 16 fighters and four civilians. As for the other 60 people killed, the statement said it was not clear that they were civilians, in part because women and children in ISIS sometimes took up arms.
Some military experts criticised the Pentagon for not ordering an independent review of the strike.
“Once again, we’ll be asked to trust that the US military can grade its own homework,” said Ms Sarah Holewinski, Washington director of Human Rights Watch and a former senior adviser on human rights to the military’s Joint Staff. “I’ve seen these investigations into civilian deaths in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. In none of them was anyone held accountable.”
In addition to the new investigation into the Syria strike, Mr Austin is still weighing newly submitted plans from top commanders on how to mitigate civilian casualties in military operations worldwide. Those steps were recommended in a separate investigation into a drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan, on Aug 29 that killed 10 civilians, including seven children.
Those recommendations are expected to be included in a larger Pentagon policy overhaul intended to mitigate civilians casualties that is now underway, Defence Department officials said Monday.
Join ST’s Telegram channel here and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Source: Read Full Article