Andrew Neil tears into ‘Harry Windsor-Markle’ as he mocks Duke of Sussex in brutal attack

Prince Harry: Timing of podcast release 'clever' says expert

When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

During his bombshell interview with Dax Shepherd and producer Monica Padman on the Armchair Expert podcast, the Duke of Sussex seemed to criticise the First Amendment – the right to free speech.

He said: “I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers.

“I don’t want to start going down the First Amendment route because that’s a huge subject and one which I don’t understand because I’ve only been here a short time.

“But, you can find a loophole in anything.

“You can capitalise or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said.”

Now, Andrew Neil has mocked the Duke of Sussex after posting his comments on Twitter.

But the former BBC veteran signed off the comments as “Harry Windsor-Markle, Montecito, CA”.

This jibe comes after others – such as Nigel Farage – mocked Harry for his comments.

Mr Farage tweeted: “For Prince Harry to condemn the USA’s First Amendment shows he has lost the plot.

“Soon he will not be wanted on either side of the pond.”

Ted Cruz, a senator for Texas and ally of the Republican party under Donald Trump, tweeted: “Nice that he can say that.”

Jack Posobiec, a hard-right activist, added: “Prince Harry is attacking America’s First Amendment.

“Tells you everything you need to know.”

Royal POLL: Should we stop calling Harry & Meghan the Duke & Duchess? [INSIGHT] 
Prince William warning: Duke and Kate to lose battle against Sussexes [REVEAL] 
Harry ‘not worried’ about criticism as Duke hints at more revelations [COMMENT]

Candace Owens, an activist and founder of a number of right-wing organisations, added: “Sunday riddle: How many more Hollywood-style interviews will Prince Harry and Meghan Markle give before they finally achieve the privacy they claim to be so desperate for?”

The First Amendment covers a number of basic freedoms in the US – including freedom of religion; speech; the press; the right to assemble and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

This comes after royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams lashed out at Harry’s claims he has found freedom and said he seems to be “increasingly trapped”.

Mr Fitzwilliams added how it is “sadly obvious” how Meghan makes up Harry’s mind now.

He told the Sun Online: “He tells us he and Meghan pretended they were ordinary people in a supermarket who didn’t know each other and got weird looks, as well they might!

“He says he knows what makes a princess because Meghan told him.

“It is easy to conclude that he no longer makes his own mind up, it seems to be made up for him.

“It’s sadly obvious.”

Harry and Meghan stepped down as senior members of the Royal Family last year.

The Duke’s latest interview comes just two months after Meghan and Harry made several explosive claims to Oprah Winfrey.

Meghan claimed there were conversations and concerns about Archie’s skin colour before he was born.

Source: Read Full Article