BBC's Tim Davie says action is taken on social media breaches
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
David Jordan, the BBC’s director of editorial policy and standards, told a Lord Committee this week that the scenario could materialise to give the “other side” of the argument. He made the statement to point out that “cancel culture” had no place in the publicly-funded corporation.
This extended to conspiracy theorists – including people who believe that the world is flat.
He explained: “Flat-earthers are not going to get as much space as people who believe that the Earth is round, but very occasionally, it might be appropriate to interview a flat-earther and if a lot of people believed in a flat Earth, [then] we would need to address it more than we do at the present time.”
Mr Jordan’s comments were quickly slammed by social media users – including from some quarters that usually back the Beeb.
Account Brother Bikini joked: “Oh fer cryin’ out loud.
“The BBC top brass clearly hasn’t learnt from their mistakes.”
Academic Bernd Porr wrote: “Incredible, so BBC is balancing opinions. Facts anyone?
“‘It’s raining!” — ‘Nope!’”
Steven Hurst joked: “OTHER NEWS AT THE BBC:
Britain leads way as Royal Navy takes command of major NATO force [ANALYSIS]
More than 150 dogs ill as urgent toxin warning issued for UK beaches [REVEALED]
Djokovic’s expulsion would be at odds with ‘integrity and reputation’ [INSIGHT]
“After complaints about the opening sequences of ‘The Blue Planet’, the BBC invite a representative from The Flat Earth Society to give the ‘other side’ of the theory that the Earth is a rotating planet.”
Even Guardian journalist Toby Moses slammed the news.
He tweeted: “I love the BBC, but the idea impartiality means broadcasting views you know to be nonsense (flat Earth) or just because some people believe it (does that include neo-Nazis?) is dangerous nonsense.”
Mr Jordan, the BBC’s director of editorial policy and standards, said that the corporation’s impartiality rested on its commitment to freedom of speech and broadcasting opinions that some may find offensive.
He added that identity was at the “hard edge of impartiality” and some of the BBC’s coverage may upset its audiences and staff.
He added: “We don’t subscribe to the cancel culture that some groups put forward,” Jordan told the Lords communications and digital committee.
“Whether or not some members of our staff like it, it’s not the point. They have to adhere to that too and they leave their prejudices at the door when they arrive.
“They need to be prepared to hear views which, perhaps personally, they don’t agree with.”
Source: Read Full Article