Prince Philip funeral: Expert slams thought of Queen sat alone
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Within the 52 members of the Commonwealth, the Queen is the head of state of 15 and they may which may choose to replace the monarch when Prince Charles ascends to the throne, an expert has claimed. Speaking to Express.co.uk, former civil servant and academic at the UCL Constitution Unit, Bob Morris claimed the 15 states will not want to be “disrespectful” to the Queen. Despite praising Charles, Mr Morris warned some may take the succession to the Queen to have “their own system”.
He said: “Although not raising certainty, is the Commonwealth countries.
“There are 15 other states to which the Queen is head of state and some of those might take the moment to change their systems.
“They don’t want to be disrespectful to Elizabeth, but they may then decide to have their own system.”
Australia has been one of the countries leading the call to replace the Queen as head of state.
In 1999 the government held a republic referendum which saw 54 percent of voters vote against changing the current system.
Indeed, former Prime Minister of Australia Malcolm Turnbull said earlier this year that Australia’s future must be debated once again following the end of the Queen’s reign.
He said: “After the end of the Queen’s reign, that is the time for us to say, ‘OK, we’ve passed that watershed.
“Do we really want to have whoever happens to be the head of state, the king or queen of the UK, automatically our head of state?”
JUST IN: Royal Family LIVE: Harry and William’s cousin to step up
However, commenting on Australia’s possible move to remove the Monarch as head of state, Mr Morris revealed it has no plausible alternative.
He added: “With that, they can’t agree among themselves, what sort of head of state they want, and how that person should be appointed.
“At one time Pierre Trudeau was breathing that fire and slaughter when he came into office in the 60s that he wasn’t going to put up with any of this monarchical nonsense.
“He discovered, actually, that issue did him rather well, that had the head of state 3,000 miles away across the sea, and that he appointed her representative in the, in the Canadian state himself in practice, and that person was never going to be a rival.
Penelope Knatchbull grew close to royals after tragic loss of family [Latest]
Prince Andrew sparks fears of embarrassing return to work [Update]
Tom Bradby accused of Megxit bias and warned deal could turn ‘toxic’ [Insight]
“In Australia, there’s no one rushing to replace the Queen at the moment.
“They will have to move with some care about how they manage the referendum.
“By them, of course, you know, a different generation will come of age, and they may take a different view and may be hot for explicit republican status.
“The notion that Australia isn’t already a republic is of course ridiculous.
“What we all share is the fact that we are republics in practice, but we share at the moment, largely by historical passing of time and adaptation, we share a hereditary head of state.”
The Queen ascended to the throne in 1952 and is one of the longest-serving monarchs in history.
Next year she will celebrate her Platinum Jubilee where the public will be given an extra bank holiday to mark the occasion.
Source: Read Full Article