Princess Margaret: How Queen’s sister broke CENTURIES of tradition

We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.

The birth of then Princess Elizabeth and her sister Margaret marked a new era for the Royal Family. They had only recently become the Windsors, having changed their name from Saxe-Coburg Gotha during World War One. While Princess Elizabeth became the Windsor-born heir to the throne, her sister marked a different milestone.

The Royal Family has a strong relationship with Scotland, having incorporated the country into the United Kingdom centuries ago.

While this relationship occasionally strains, the current Queen and her ancestor Queen Victoria, hold it close to their hearts.

Both spent years in the country after having grown up mostly in England, but Princess Margaret was the first royal born there in centuries.

The Queen Mother gave birth to Margaret on a “stormy night” at Glamis Castle in 1930, marking the first time this had happened since the year 1600.

Glamis Castle belonged to the Queen Mother’s family, Lord and Lady Glamis, and she gave birth to Margaret while the 13th Earl was in residence.

Before Margaret, the last royal born at the castle was Charles I on November 19, 1600.

His birth came before the union, however, while Scotland still had a monarchy of its own.

Charles I was the penultimate monarch before the union took effect, ending the Scottish monarchy.

Would an independent Scotland become a republic?

The Queen is a monarch of the United Kingdom, meaning she “rules” over all three countries bound by the Treaty of Union.

But recent questions have emerged about Scottish independence, with steam building towards another vote.

In the case the country eventually gains its freedom from the union, people have questioned whether it would ditch the monarchy.

DON’T MISS
Queen’s ‘vulnerable childhood’ helped inspire new novel on Governess – ANALYSIS
Queen to mark painful anniversary of sister Margaret’s birthday – INSIGHT
The Crown: Why did Helena Bonham Carter nearly reject The Crown role? – EXPLAINER

Writing on question and answer site Quora, one former Scottish lawyer broke down whether or not Scots would want to become a republic.

She said: “If the result were different from 2014, it would not follow that Scotland would become a republic.

“The Scottish and English have shared a monarch since 1603, long before the Treaty of Union in 1707, so the two aren’t necessarily linked.

“The Scots never refer to the Queen as ‘the Queen of England’. That’s not to say all Scots are sympathetic to the idea of monarchy.”

The poster added Scots wouldn’t likely drift towards a republic, rather they would opt for a compromise.

She added: “The arguments for independence and the arguments for abolition of the monarchy are not the same.

“The ideological argument would be coloured by the Scottish people’s relationship with the current Royal family.

“On balance, I suspect a constitutional monarchy would be more likely than not and, indeed, it would be the default absent other legal changes following a split from the Union.”

Source: Read Full Article