Royal POLL: Should Prince Harry be stripped of all remaining royal links after attack?

Prince Harry: Stacey Solomon defends podcast appearance

When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Harry spoke to the US actor for his podcast Armchair Expert, where the royal discussed his upbringing. The Duke appeared to criticise the way he had been raised by his father Prince Charles and the wider Royal Family, prompting outrage from royal experts. Harry said he had to go through “genetic pain and suffering” before he quit the Firm and headed for LA.

In response to the new bombshell claims, where he said that life in the Royal Family was “a mix of being in The Truman Show and being in the zoo”, Express.co.uk wants to know your views.

Do you think Harry should be stripped of all his remaining royal links, such as his official Duke of Sussex title?

Moreover, despite stepping down as a senior royal with his wife Meghan Markle, the Duke remains in the British line of succession.

Harry is currently sixth in line to the throne, with his son Archie coming in seventh.

But do you think MPs should start proceedings to oust Harry from the official list?

JUST IN: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘divided’ by new revelations

The British royal line of succession is regulated by family descent as well as by Parliamentary statute.

The Act of Settlement, 1701, confirmed that it was for Parliament to determine the title to the throne.

Due to Parliament’s involvement in the line of succession, altering it would require new legislation.

As a result, for Prince Harry to be removed from the list, Boris Johnson’s Government would have to step in and propose a Bill outlining this.

If you can’t access the survey, click here

This happened last century, during the crisis surrounding King Edward VIII’s abdication.

His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act 1936 recognised and ratified the abdication, and passed the line of succession to his brother, King George VI.

Harry has been accused of “shameful behaviour” and spouting “unpleasant disloyal nonsense” for continuing to publicly bash the Royal Family.

Angela Levin, a royal expert who wrote a biography on the Duke of Sussex, branded Harry’s latest remarks as “disgusting”.

DON’T MISS:
‘Nothing is their fault!’ Palace insider exposes royal rage at Harry [DETAILS]
Prince Harry’s parenting swipe is ‘slap in face’ to Charles and Queen [INSIGHT]
Royal Family LIVE: Harry ‘throws Queen under bus’ – fury at outburst [BLOG]

While appearing on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, she said: “He is being incredibly rude again.

“He seems to lash back at his family in the most unpleasant, disloyal way.”

She later debunked Harry’s claim that Meghan Markle was behind his decision to get therapy, saying this was “nonsense”.

Instead, she argued that his brother Prince William was the main person urging the Duke to get help behind the scenes.

Royal expert Robert Jobson also heavily criticised Harry’s latest interview.

He told Australian breakfast show Sunrise: “You’ve got to take some of it seriously because he believes it in himself, you know, mental health is a big big issue out there.

“But to keep harping on about this, it’s getting embarrassing.

“To not only criticise his father’s parenting skills, but also the Queen and Prince Philip who has only just had his funeral, I think it smacks of pretty shameful behaviour.”

But others have rushed to the Duke’s defence, with Meghan and Harry’s unofficial biographer lashing out at the criticism.

Taking to Twitter, Omid Scobie said: “As Mental Health Awareness Week ends, perhaps the past 24-hours can be something we all reflect on? A mental health activist opening up about their own experiences, only to be torn apart for doing the thing that so many are working tirelessly to destigmatize. This is not progress.”

Source: Read Full Article