Top Tories have joined calls for Dominic Cummings to be banned from scientific advisory meetings during the coronavirus crisis.
Boris Johnson, who is set to return to work tomorrow, is now facing cross-party pressure to prevent his chief advisor from attending the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) meetings.
David Davis, former Brexit Secretary, fears the presence of ‘non-scientist members’could lead to changes in the advice given from the Sage committee.
‘We should publish the membership of Sage, remove any non-scientist members, publish their advice in full, and publish dissenting opinions with the advice,’ said Mr Davis.
Cummings and Ben Warner, an advisor who worked on the Vote Leave campaign, both attended the Sage meeting on the day that Boris Johnson announced the lockdown, according to the Guardian.
Pressure is now mounting for Downing Street to show greater transparency on Sage meetings.
Conservative chair of the Commons science committee, Greg Clark, said: ‘I have great respect for Sir Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty, the co-chairs of Sage. I am sure the scientits they ask to serve on the group are of the highest calibre.
‘For that reason, disclosing who has attended Sage meetings could reassure and enhance the standing of the body, whose advice is so important to the country at this time. It would also allow for a better understanding of the range of disciplines which are shaping advice to government.’
The medical director of NHS England has declined to comment on whether or not Mr Johnson’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings made contributions to a meeting of scientists during the coronavirus outbreak.
Downing Street has dismissed claims its scientific advice could be politicised following the disclosure that Mr Cummings has attended Sage meetings.
Professor Stephen Powis, one of the few publicly-known members of the panel, emphasised it was a ‘scientific discussion’ when asked about what contributions Mr Cummings made to meetings.
He told a Downing Street briefing on Saturday that his experience of Sage has ‘absolutely been about scientists and experts’.
‘At Sage, it is a scientific discussion. What I have witnessed and experienced is a scientific discussion between scientific advisers,’ Prof Powis said.
‘Robust discussion at time as we consider the evidence, conclude what the evidence is telling us, sometimes point to where the evidence is missing and where we need to gain and generate further evidence.’
He added that the group then provides advice to Government officials ‘in terms of the scientific basis of the choices that Government quite rightly has to make as elected representatives’.
Pushed on whether or not Mr Cummings made a contribution, Prof Powis said: ‘It’s the scientists that make the scientific contributions and the scientists and the experts in that group, that are absolutely involved in generating the advice.
‘The advice comes from those scientific experts to Government, and Government officials, that’s exactly what Sage is set up to do.
‘And that is exactly what my experience is of the way Sage works.’
A No 10 spokesman confirmed that Mr Cummings and Dr Warner had attended or listened in to Sage meetings, but denied they had in any way affected the group’s advice.
‘Sage provides independent scientific advice to the Government. Political advisers have no role in this,’ the spokesman said.
‘The scientists on Sage are among the most eminent in their fields. It is factually wrong and damaging to sensible public debate to imply their advice is affected by government advisers listening to discussions.’
The spokesman said Mr Cummings and Dr Warner had been seeking to better understand the scientific debate around coronavirus, as well as the limits as to how science and data could assist Government decision-making.
‘Occasionally they ask questions or offer help when scientists mention problems in Whitehall,’ the spokesman said.
Professor Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College – who is a member of Sage, told news website UnHerd that there have been ‘a number of observers’ at such meetings.
Asked about attendance by Mr Cummings, Prof Ferguson said: ‘There have been a number of observers at meetings who I have to say have not interfered with the business of those meetings at all.’
He said that throughout the pandemic, politicians have been the ones who made the decisions rather than the scientists.
‘In terms of the interaction with policy makers, my UK experience is that we have given insight into how different courses of inaction would lead to certain consequences,’ he said.
‘Estimates of if you did this, then this might happen, if you did this, this might happen.
‘We have not made politicians’ decisions for them, politicians have made the decisions.’
Shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said the disclosure raised ‘significant questions’ about the credibility of Government decision-making, and called for ‘full transparency’ on who attends the meetings.
Coronavirus latest news and updates
- Visit our live blog for the latest updates: Coronavirus news live
- Read all new and breaking stories on our Covid-19 news page
- Coronavirus symptoms explained
- Find out the latest on which shops can stay open in a lockdown
- Who needs to go to work, who needs to stay at home and who is classed as a key worker?
Source: Read Full Article