Sturgeon ‘put back in her tartan box’ as Supreme Court shuts down independence ambition

Patrick Christys calls Nicola Sturgeon a 'poundland dictator'

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

GB News presenter Patrick Christys has branded Nicola Sturgeon a “Poundland dictator” in a lengthy rant after the UK Supreme Court curbed the wings of the Scottish Parliament in a ruling on Wednesday. A bill to incorporate a UN treaty on children’s rights into Scottish law was found by Supreme Justice to have breached the “Scotland Act”. Mr Chistrys argued the ruling will have a big impact on the SNP’s push for a second referendum on independence. 

Mr Christys told GB News: “I’ve long thought that Nicola Sturgeon was somewhat of a Poundland dictator, but now there appears to be some hard legal evidence for it. 

“The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the First Minister has overstepped her powers and, frankly, put her firmly back in her tartan box.

“On the face of it, it might not seem that significant that Five senior judges including Lord Reed, the court’s Scottish president, unanimously found that two Bills passed by MSPs in March were incompatible with the 1998 Scotland Act that underpins devolution.

They said four parts of a Bill about children’s rights and two provisions in one about local government were outside the parliament’s legislative competence because they imposed duties on UK ministers in reserved areas. It’s the kind of legal terminology that makes you want just give up and walk into the sea.

JUST IN Cressida Dick resign probe sees top Tory blast Met Commissioner ‘Very serious questions’

 

He continued: “But actually this is massive because it could be curtains for Scottish independence. 

“What it means, is that it sets a legal precedent that Sturgeon absolutely can’t call an independence referendum without Westminster’s consent.

“It would be illegal if she did. 

“It’s an absolute hammer blow for Sturgeon’s lifelong dream.”

Sturgeon criticised by Hoy for blaming Brexit and Covid

The GB News host added: “A solid left hook. But wait, there’s more…the knockout blow was dealt by Scottish Secretary Alister Jack.

“He’s said he doesn’t want another independence referendum for 25 years. 

“Why? Well, that’s how long he thinks it’ll be before it can be classed as ‘another generation’, because, of course, the independence vote was supposed to be ‘once in a generation’.

“There is also the added caveat that in order to call one, he believes support for independence would have to consistently poll above 60%. Which it absolutely isn’t doing and quite possibly never will.

 DON’T MISS

Sarah Everard’s father demands murderer looks at him [REVEAL]
Cliff Richard ‘honoured to join’ campaign calling for police overhaul [INSIGHT]
Priti Patel fumes at ‘abuse of trust’ as she hits out at Sarah killer [ANALYSIS]

“In fact, ironically, only 38% of Scots agreed that Sturgeon should hold a referendum without Westminster’s consent.

“So she’s considering doing something her own people don’t even want.

“You’ve got to feel for Queen Nic. She’s 51 years old.

“She’s already been First Minister for 7 years. In 25 years’ time, she’ll be 76 and there’s no way she’ll be in power then. What does that mean? Well, her lifelong ambition will never be realised, everything she’d hoped and dreamed for politically, her life’s work, he raison d’etre, dashed against the rocks.”

Source: Read Full Article