THE recent coronavirus outbreak could have started as early as September, scientists are warning.
Cases of Covid-19 were believed to have first emerged in December 2019 and were linked to a wet market in Wuhan, China.
⚠️ Read our coronavirus live blog for the latest news & updates
However, researchers from the University of Cambridge have now claimed the outbreak could have begun six months ago – and much further south than the central Chinese city of Wuhan.
The scientists made their revelation about the virus' origin after analysing a large number of strains from around the world.
And they calculated that the initial outbreak occurred in a window between September 13 and December 7 – before going on to infect almost two million people across the world.
University of Cambridge geneticist Peter Forster said: "The virus may have mutated into its final ‘human-efficient’ form months ago, but stayed inside a bat or other animal or even human for several months without infecting other individuals.
"Then, it started infecting and spreading among humans between September 13 and December 7."
The team analysed the different strains of coronavirus using a phylogenetic network – a mathematical process that can map the global movement of organisms through the mutation of their genes.
They were still trying to pinpoint the exact location of patient zero, and were hoping for help from scientists in China.
However, some early signs were prompting them to look into areas to the south of Wuhan, where coronavirus infections were first reported in December.
“What we reconstruct in the network is the first significant spread among humans,” Forster added.
In the new study, which has not been peer-reviewed, the scientists could trace the origin of the virus' global spread more precisely with every strain they analysed.
CORONAVIRUS CRISIS – STAY IN THE KNOW
Don't miss the latest news and figures – and essential advice for you and your family.
To receive The Sun's Coronavirus newsletter in your inbox every tea time, sign up here.
To follow us on Facebook, simply 'Like' our Coronavirus page.
Get Britain's best-selling newspaper delivered to your smartphone or tablet each day – find out more.
By counting the mutations, they could get closer to working out when the first person was infected by a strain that was closest to the first outbreak.
Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, is believed to have originated from bats.
It has been found to share 96 per cent identical genes with a coronavirus isolated by Chinese scientists from bat droppings in the southwestern province of Yunnan in 2013.
Despite this, there were hundreds of mutations between Sars-CoV-2 and the one in Yunnan, and a coronavirus usually acquires one mutation per month.
Some scientists have therefore suspected the virus may have been spreading quietly in host animals and humans for years to gradually evolve to a highly adaptive form that could infect humans.
According to the Cambridge team, the first outbreak could be a recent event involving the last few mutations that completed the leap from harmless strain to deadly pathogen.
The virus’ origin has become the subject of droves of conspiracy theories.
Online rumours have claimed the virus was created in a lab and is the work of the US military, while other wacky webizens allege the outbreak was designed to stop Brexit.
Earlier this week, it was reported that the virus could have originated from a biosafety laboratory in Wuhan.
Despite this, this lab-origin theory has long been dismissed by top scientists across the world due to scientific evidence pointing to a natural origin.
The ongoing Cambridge study could shed more light on the issue.
“If I am pressed for an answer, I would say the original spread started more likely in southern China than in Wuhan,” Forster said.
“But proof can only come from analysing more bats, possibly other potential host animals, and preserved tissue samples in Chinese hospitals stored between September and December.
“This kind of research project would help us understand how the transmission happened, and help us prevent similar instances in the future.”
Su Bing, a genetic researcher with the Kunming Institute of Zoology in Yunnan, said the Cambridge study was eye-opening but their method had its limits.
He revealed that during an unprecedented outbreak, the virus could undergo transformations in unpredictable patterns.
“So it cannot be very precise – there is always a margin for error,” he said.
“This work may provide some important clues to future investigations, but the conclusions should be treated with caution.”
Give now to The Sun's NHS appeal
BRITAIN’s four million NHS staff are on the frontline in the battle against coronavirus.
But while they are helping save lives, who is there to help them?
The Sun has launched an appeal to raise £1MILLION for NHS workers.
The Who Cares Wins Appeal aims to get vital support to staff in their hour of need.
We have teamed up with NHS Charities Together in their urgent Covid-19 Appeal to ensure the money gets to exactly who needs it.
The Sun is donating £50,000 and we would like YOU to help us raise a million pounds, to help THEM.
No matter how little you can spare, please donate today here
Earlier this week, it was claimed that the new strain of coronavirus responsible for Covid-19 could have jumped from bats to humans via stray dogs.
They say the virus may have mutated in the intestines of dogs before leaping to humans.
Early studies showed the new strain of coronavirus did originate in bats, but scientists have been trying to find which animal that transferred it from bats to humans.
Source: Read Full Article