London minicab drivers will have to pay congestion charge after High Court rules move does not discriminate against ethnic minority and female drivers
- The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) lost its case today
- Had claimed Mr Khan’s decision disproportionately affects BAME drivers
- Meanwhile, black cab drivers – who are mainly white – exempt from charge
- The union announced today that they would appeal the High Court ruling
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan’s decision to introduce the congestion charge for minicab and Uber drivers is not unlawfully discriminatory, the High Court has ruled.
The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) had claimed that removing minicabs’ exemption from the £11.50 daily fee indirectly discriminates against a 94% black and minority ethnic (BAME) workforce.
The union claimed Mr Khan’s decision, which came into effect in April, disproportionately affects BAME drivers, while drivers of London’s traditional black cabs – 88% of whom are white – remain exempt from the charge.
Sadiq Khan’s decision to introduce the congestion charge for minicab drivers is not unlawfully discriminatory, the High Court has ruled. He is seen at an event in London last month
In a statement after the ruling, a Mayor of London spokesman said: ‘We are pleased with the judge’s decision.
‘Removing the congestion charge exemption for private hire vehicles, apart from those that are wheelchair-accessible, is an important part of our plans both to reduce traffic volumes and congestion in London, with the additional benefits of reduced air pollution.’
At a hearing in London earlier this month, lawyers for the union said Mr Khan and Transport for London (TfL) accept that the decision puts BAME and female drivers, and disabled passengers, at a disadvantage.
Ben Collins QC told the court: ‘Drivers are driven out of business or required to work hours which impact on their family, well-being and potentially health.
‘Disabled passengers have their ability to travel to central London significantly affected.’
He added: ‘The question for the court is whether the removal of the exemption is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.’
Mr Collins said those drivers affected by the change are 94% BAME, have ‘typically low’ earnings and 71% of them live in the most deprived areas of London.
He told the court the average annual earnings of a driver is less than £23,000 after tax and that many work long hours to ‘provide for their families in difficult circumstances’.
He said a minicab driver working 22 days a month would spend around £230 a month on the congestion charge, which would equate to almost 10% of their income.
The union claimed Mr Khan’s decision, which came into effect in April, disproportionately affects BAME drivers
Mr Collins added: ‘The discriminatory effect of this measure wholly outweighs such limited benefits as the defendant is able to establish.’
In a statement, IWGB general secretary Jason Moyer-Lee confirmed the union would pursue an appeal against the ruling, saying: ‘The IWGB is not about to give up at the first set-back.’
He added: ‘The judge, defendant Sadiq Khan, and we all agreed that this charge is bad for ethnic minority and female drivers.
‘The question is whether or not the mayor can legally justify it by showing it’s reasonable and there were no better alternative measures to reduce congestion.
‘He hasn’t done this and the judge adopted the incorrect legal test when assessing the matter. So now we take the fight to the Court of Appeal.’
Source: Read Full Article